Tycoon solutionThe AI CTO and AI Customer Support run bug triage as a continuous loop: ingest signals from Sentry, Intercom, status page comments, Twitter, and App Store reviews; dedupe across sources; score severity by user impact × revenue exposure; write a reproducer when possible; file one Linear issue per root cause and route it. Regressions get caught because the AI remembers every prior bug.
How it runs
- Multi-source ingestion
Webhooks from Sentry (errors, performance), Datadog (infra), Intercom (customer reports), Crisp, status page comments, App Store/Play Store reviews, Twitter mentions with 'broken/not working' sentiment. Each signal becomes a raw event tagged by source, timestamp, and affected user/account.
- Dedupe and root-cause grouping
Sentry already groups by stack trace. The AI does the next layer: it links customer reports to Sentry groups by matching user session IDs, ties Twitter complaints to infra events by timestamp correlation, and collapses near-duplicate groups (same root cause, different surface). Result: one issue per real problem, not 400 alerts for one 500ms DB hiccup.
- Severity scoring
AI CTO computes severity: S0 (revenue-blocking, payments down, signups broken, auth failing), S1 (degraded core flow for paid users), S2 (edge case affecting a minority), S3 (cosmetic or low-frequency). Score factors: % of users affected, revenue exposure (paid customers impacted × their MRR), whether a workaround exists, and growth-over-time rate.
- Reproducer synthesis
For any S0/S1, AI CTO attempts a reproducer. It pulls the stack trace, recent git commits, user actions from PostHog, and writes a Playwright script or a curl command that triggers the error locally. If it can reproduce, it attaches the script. If it can't, it logs what it tried and hands off to you with 'Couldn't reproduce — here's what I ruled out.'
- Route to fix path
S0: pages you directly via Slack/SMS with evidence bundle, drafts a status page incident, and starts a Zoom bridge in case you want backup. S1: creates a Linear issue tagged urgent, assigns to the right sub-repo based on stack trace (frontend / API / billing / etc.), includes reproducer and impacted user list. S2/S3: queue in the weekly bug review for batching.
- Customer communication
For customer-reported bugs, AI Customer Support sends an acknowledgment within 10 minutes of the report: 'Got it, we can reproduce, tracking as issue #847. Expected fix: this week/today/checking.' No 'we're looking into it' template — the reply names the issue number and gives a real ETA from the AI CTO's estimate.
- Regression check on every deploy
Before any PR merges, the AI CTO cross-references the diff against all closed bug issues from the last 90 days. If the code change touches a file previously implicated in a closed bug, it flags: 'This PR modifies X, which was involved in fixed bug #712. Consider adding a regression test.' Catches the same-bug-twice problem before deploy.
- Weekly bug debt review
Friday afternoon, AI CTO posts the bug portfolio: S0/S1 resolved this week, S2 queued, S3 accepted-as-tolerable. Flags any issue aging >30 days ('dark pattern: this has been open since Feb 3, 6 customers still hitting it'). You decide which aged issues to force into this week's slots.
Who runs it
- hire/ai-cto
- hire/ai-customer-support
- hire/ai-coo
What you get
- S0 incidents from first signal to you being paged in under 5 minutes
- Customer bug reports acknowledged within 10 minutes with a real ETA
- Working reproducer attached to 60-80% of S1 bugs before any human touches them
- Regressions caught pre-deploy via cross-reference against closed bug history
- One Linear issue per root cause, not one per user complaint
- Weekly bug debt is visible — no issue rots unnoticed for 6 months
- Status page kept current without manual 'is this still happening?' checks