You'd think this is a 30-min decision — Tycoon Agent runs the actual benchmark, models the cost, and saves you from the "unlimited PTO" trap.
The short answer
Tycoon Agent designs your PTO policy by benchmarking your peers, modeling the cost and behavioral impact of each option, and drafting the final language. She asks 4 calibration questions (headcount, jurisdictions, current policy if any, founder bias toward unlimited vs fixed), benchmarks 15-20 comparable companies via public sources (handbooks, careers pages, Glassdoor), models 3 options for your team — fixed accrual, unlimited, hybrid (fixed minimum) — with cost, average days taken, burnout signals, and admin overhead per option, recommends one with reasoning, and drafts the policy language plus an internal rollout doc explaining the decision to your team. Most teams that use this avoid the "unlimited PTO = nobody takes time" trap and ship a policy that actually gets used.
How Tycoon Agent actually does it
- Calibrate context
4 questions: headcount, jurisdictions (CA accrual rules differ from TX), current policy if any, founder bias on unlimited vs fixed.
- Benchmark peers
15-20 comparable companies (similar stage, industry, headcount). Pull from public handbooks, careers pages, Glassdoor reviews. Categorize by policy type.
WebSearch
- Model 3 options
Fixed accrual, unlimited, hybrid (fixed minimum). Per option: estimated days taken, payroll cost, admin load, behavioral risk (burnout, hoarding, abuse).
- Recommend with reasoning
One recommendation grounded in your stage + culture. Explain why the others lose for your context. No "depends, here's a list" — make a real call.
- Draft policy + rollout
Final policy language for the handbook. Internal rollout doc explaining the decision to the team in plain English. Notion doc, ready to publish.
Notion
What it looks like in chat
YouDesign our PTO policy. We're 14 people, US remote, no formal policy yet.
Tycoon AgentPulled 18 peer benchmarks (similar-stage YC/Series A SaaS, fully remote, 10-30 people): - 11 use **fixed (15-20 days)** — most common - 4 use **unlimited** — 2 publicly admit team takes <12 days/yr - 3 use **hybrid (15 day minimum, more if needed)** — newest pattern **My recommendation: hybrid (15 day minimum, take more as needed).** Why: - Avoids "unlimited = nobody takes" trap (data: unlimited teams average 11 days, fixed teams 17 days) - Avoids "hoarding for payout" trap of pure fixed (CA requires payout on departure → liability builds) - Sends signal: rest is required, not optional **Modeled cost:** at 15 days × 14 people × avg loaded comp $190K → ~$153K/yr in time off productivity. Same as fixed-15. Marginally less than unlimited (which lands at 12-13 days actual). **Drafted in Notion:** - Policy language (handbook section) - Rollout post for team explaining the "15 day minimum" framing - CA-specific accrual carve-out (CA requires accrual tracking even with the minimum framing) Review the Notion doc and approve to publish?
What you get back
A Notion doc with: 3 modeled options, peer benchmark, recommended policy with reasoning, final policy language for the handbook, and an internal rollout post for the team.
Cadence: One-shot decision; revisit annually.