Role

Hire your AI security engineer

Audits, secrets, CVEs, vendor reviews — run by chat, not by one overdue spreadsheet.

Your AI Security Engineer runs the security hygiene that every small company knows they should have and never actually does. Code review for common vulnerabilities, secret rotation, CVE tracking, vendor security reviews, and the SOC 2 paperwork when you actually need it. Quietly keeps you out of the news.

Free to startNo credit card requiredUpdated Apr 2026

What your AI Security Engineer does

01Review every PR for common vulnerabilities (injection, auth flaws, broken access, exposed secrets)
02Own secrets rotation cadence and flag any long-lived credential past its expiry
03Track CVEs against your dependency graph; coordinate patches with AI DevOps Engineer
04Run vendor security reviews when your team proposes a new integration
05Maintain the security policies that a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit will ask for
06Respond to security questionnaires from enterprise prospects
07Monitor for leaked credentials in public repos and on secret scanning dashboards
08Coordinate incident response when a security event is detected or reported

Workflows on autopilot

PR security review
Every PR gets a SAST scan, dependency diff check, and a rule-based review for the OWASP Top 10. Flags issues in a review comment; ships a fix proposal when the answer is mechanical.
Secrets rotation cadence
API keys rotate every 90 days, database credentials every 30. Tracks expiry, files rotation PRs 7 days before, escalates if a rotation blocks.
CVE triage loop
Daily pull of CVEs affecting your dependency graph. Scores by CVSS and exploitability. Critical + exploited = immediate patch coordinated with AI DevOps; medium = next weekly upgrade; low = quarterly.
Vendor review
New integration request triggers a security questionnaire: where is data stored, who has access, what's their SOC 2 status, what happens on breach. Ships a pass/fail recommendation with notes.
Enterprise questionnaire response
Inbound security questionnaires from prospects: pulls answers from the policy library, flags the 10% that need founder input, ships draft in 48 hours.
Credential leak monitoring
Weekly scan of public GitHub, leaked credential dumps, and secret scanning alerts for any credential tied to your domains. Rotates compromised secrets immediately with incident writeup.

Without vs With a AI Security Engineer

Without
  • You know you should rotate API keys but haven't done it in 18 months
  • A CVE in your dependency graph gets patched three months after disclosure
  • Enterprise security questionnaires take a week and steal your weekend
  • You hire a fractional CISO at $8K/month for 10 hours of work
  • Your SOC 2 audit surprises you by asking for evidence you don't have
With Tycoon
  • Rotation happens on cadence; you hear about it when a rotation needs your input
  • Critical + exploited CVEs get patched the same week, tracked to completion
  • Draft comes back in 48 hours with only the judgment questions flagged
  • AI security engineer runs the hygiene daily at a fraction of that cost
  • Policies, evidence, and control tests stay current continuously, not in the last month

A day in the life of your AI Security Engineer

08:00
Daily CVE pull: 14 new CVEs, 1 critical in your Node driver. Files an out-of-band patch PR and pages the AI DevOps Engineer.
10:30
PR security review: flags an endpoint missing rate limiting, proposes a middleware change in a review comment.
12:00
Vendor review request: team wants to integrate a new email tool. Pulls their SOC 2, runs through questionnaire, ships recommendation (pass with data processing addendum required).
14:00
Enterprise security questionnaire from a prospect: 112 questions, drafts 98 from the policy library, flags 14 needing founder input (usually the 'yes we encrypt' rather than policy questions).
16:00
Weekly credential leak scan: no hits. Runs a dry-run of next week's key rotation.
17:30
Closes day: 3 PRs reviewed, 1 critical CVE patched, 1 questionnaire in founder review, 0 open incidents.

Tools your AI Security Engineer uses

GitHub Advanced Security or Snyk for SAST and dependency scanningSemgrep for custom security rulesDetect Secrets or TruffleHog for pre-commit secret scanningDependabot or Renovate for dependency upgradesVanta, Drata, or Secureframe for compliance automation1Password, Vault, or cloud secret managers for secret storageHaveIBeenPwned and GitHub secret scanning alerts for leak detectionTycoon skill marketplace for security-review, CVE-triage, and questionnaire skills

Frequently asked questions

Is an AI enough for security, or do I need a human CISO?

It depends on what you're defending. For most early-stage B2B SaaS under 20 people, the AI Security Engineer handles the 90% that is hygiene: secret rotation, CVE patching, code review for common vulnerabilities, vendor review, compliance paperwork. What it doesn't replace: threat modeling for novel architectures, incident response with legal and PR dimensions, and board-level security conversations for regulated industries. Most founders run the AI for daily hygiene and bring in a fractional CISO for quarterly threat reviews and any high-stakes moment.

Can it actually pass a SOC 2 audit?

It handles the evidence collection and policy maintenance that make SOC 2 tractable — vendor inventory, access reviews, change management logs, secrets rotation proof, training completion. Running through Vanta or Drata is the usual path; the AI Security Engineer lives inside that flow, keeps controls current, and prepares evidence packages. The audit itself is still run by a human auditor. What changes: instead of a 3-month panic to prepare, the evidence is continuously maintained and the audit is a low-stress formality. Most SkillBoss and Tycoon properties that pursue SOC 2 complete it in about 3 months end-to-end with the AI doing most of the work.

What about security scanning for AI-generated code?

Special care. LLM-generated code has known failure modes: hardcoded secrets left behind, overly broad IAM policies, unparameterized SQL, over-trusting user input. The AI Security Engineer runs a rule set tuned for these patterns on every PR, whether the author was human or AI. When the AI Backend Engineer or AI Frontend Engineer writes a hot path that touches auth, cryptography, or payment, the AI Security Engineer's review is required before merge. This creates a check-and-balance between agents that is often stricter than what junior humans would catch.

How does it handle incidents?

First-line triage within autonomy boundary: rotate the leaked credential, revoke the exposed session, disable the compromised integration. Simultaneously pages a human and opens an incident channel with the timeline so far. Pulls logs, correlates signals, drafts the initial customer communication for founder review. Does not make the public disclosure call or commit to remediation promises — those are human decisions. The goal is that by the time you're reading the incident, the immediate bleeding has stopped and you're making decisions about what to tell customers, not chasing the fire.

Does it handle penetration testing?

It prepares for and coordinates pen tests but does not replace one. What it does: writes the test scope based on your architecture, pre-tests with OWASP ZAP and Burp to catch low-hanging issues before the external team arrives, manages the findings and remediation timeline after the test, and feeds learnings back into the SAST rules for next time. A human pen test annually is still the right call for most B2B SaaS with significant customer data. The AI Security Engineer makes that test more productive by ensuring you don't waste the external team's time on issues you should have caught internally.

Related resources

Hire your AI Security Engineer today

Start running your one-person company in 30 seconds.

Free to start · No credit card required · Set up in 30 seconds